<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Net Neutrality on Deck In Washington D.C.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jeffbennett.com/2008/11/net-neutrality-on-deck/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jeffbennett.com/2008/11/net-neutrality-on-deck/</link>
	<description>Sharing experiences as an entrepreneur, social media man, e-commerce pioneer, and student of life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 21:29:07 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: nofreelunch</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffbennett.com/2008/11/net-neutrality-on-deck/comment-page-1/#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>nofreelunch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 16:20:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dealsbennett.wordpress.com/2008/11/15/net-neutrality-on-deck/#comment-51</guid>
		<description>Very interesting new piece on network neutrality in the December 15 Wall Street Journal, has some background I&#039;d never read and discusses some evolved opinions:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122929270127905065.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting new piece on network neutrality in the December 15 Wall Street Journal, has some background I&#8217;d never read and discusses some evolved opinions:</p>
<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122929270127905065.html" rel="nofollow">http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122929270127905065.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dealsbennett</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffbennett.com/2008/11/net-neutrality-on-deck/comment-page-1/#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator>dealsbennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 07:43:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dealsbennett.wordpress.com/2008/11/15/net-neutrality-on-deck/#comment-50</guid>
		<description>I would echo your concerns on the government intervening and making it worse.  I think the alternative of having companies overreach is more troublesome.  In a free market we all speak with our wallet so if we did not like one offering&#039;s implementation of of a less than free web then we move.  Not so easy in cable when you only have one choice.  There are also plenty of ways for cable, satellite, wireless and hosting companies to innovate without curtailing our access as part of their business models.  We have to all stay close on this one and see how it unfolds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would echo your concerns on the government intervening and making it worse.  I think the alternative of having companies overreach is more troublesome.  In a free market we all speak with our wallet so if we did not like one offering&#8217;s implementation of of a less than free web then we move.  Not so easy in cable when you only have one choice.  There are also plenty of ways for cable, satellite, wireless and hosting companies to innovate without curtailing our access as part of their business models.  We have to all stay close on this one and see how it unfolds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nofreelunch</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffbennett.com/2008/11/net-neutrality-on-deck/comment-page-1/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>nofreelunch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 05:13:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dealsbennett.wordpress.com/2008/11/15/net-neutrality-on-deck/#comment-49</guid>
		<description>hmm, I&#039;m not so sure how I feel about this one. legislating fairness sounds good on the one hand, on the other hand I don&#039;t trust lawmakers not to screw it up. if providers think the market will tolerate this, why not let them go ahead and try it. but my biggest concern would be opening the internet to the kinds of regulations that stifle competition and innovation in other industries. it looks to me like legislation in search of a problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmm, I&#8217;m not so sure how I feel about this one. legislating fairness sounds good on the one hand, on the other hand I don&#8217;t trust lawmakers not to screw it up. if providers think the market will tolerate this, why not let them go ahead and try it. but my biggest concern would be opening the internet to the kinds of regulations that stifle competition and innovation in other industries. it looks to me like legislation in search of a problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

